Table of Contents:
- India China Relations
- India-China Border Dispute
- India-China Border Dispute History
- Solved Questions on India-China Relations:
- Explain the origin, dimensions, and implications of the Sino-Indian border dispute. ( UPSC 2016)
- Discuss the issues involved in the Indo-China border dispute. ( 66th BPSC)
- The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is viewed as a cardinal subset of China's larger "One Belt One Road " initiative. Give a brief description of CPEC and enumerate the reasons why India has distanced itself from the same. ( UPPSC 2018)
- Discuss the nature of India-China relations in the light of OBOR. ( UPPSC 2018)
- Despite cordial Mamallpuram Submit between Prime Minister Modi and the Chinese President, the dispute on the line of actual control has deepened after a gap of several years. What do you think, are the reasons behind it? ( UPPSC 2020)
- MCQ and Quiz on India-China Border
India China Relations
China and India were two great powers in Asia before Western imperialism. Tibet and the Himalayas acted as a buffer between India and China, due to this there was little influence of each other between the two countries. As a result, both countries were not very familiar with each other. There were difficulties in evolving foreign policy when both countries confronted each other in the twentieth century.
Unlike Pakistan, India started a relationship with China very friendly. After the Chinese Revolution in 1949, India was one of the first nations to recognize the communist government of China. It was felt at that time that China was a friendly neighbor and they would never attack India. For a long time, the border between India and China was guarded by para-military forces, not the army.
The Panchsheel Agreement was signed between India and China in 1954, under the agreement India recognized China's claim on Tibet. In 1958, there were armed rebellions in Tibet against Chinese occupation; Later, in 1959, the Dalai Lama took refuge in India. Later relations between China and India deteriorated as China accused India of allowing anti-China activities from within India.
India-China Border Issues:
Regarding boundaries, India claimed that the boundary between India and China was settled in colonial times. However, China said that the colonial decisions would not apply.
Let us understand the border dispute between India and China by dividing the border into three parts:
- Ladakh: 1597 km
- Uttarakhand: 345 km
- Himachal Pradesh: 200 km
- Sikkim: 220 km
- Arunachal Pradesh: 1126 km
The length of the total border between the two countries is about 3488 km ( second highest after Bangladesh).
The border of Sino-India can be divided into three parts:
- Western Sector
- Middle Sector
- Eastern Sector
- Aksai-chin in Ladakh
- Much of the area of Arunachal Pradesh
Western Sector
The Boundary line with Ladakh Union Territory is called the western part of the Sino-India boundary.
It is approximately 2,152 Km.
There are two disputes in the Western sector:
- Shaksgam Valley
- Aksai Chin
Shaksgam Valley:
- Shaksgam Valley was sold to China by Pakistan in 1963 but it is our territory.
Dispute over Aksai's chin:
- As per Johnson Line created in 1865, Aksai chin was shown to Indian territory.
- As per MacDonald's line created in 1893, Aksai's chin was shown to China's territory.
- India considers Johnson's line is correct but China rejects and considers McDonald's line is correct.
- Aksai Chin was occupied by China from 1957 to 1959, since then it has had control over China.
Middle Sector:
- It is about 625 km in Uttarakhand and the Himachal Pradesh State.
- No major disputes on either side.
Eastern part:
- As per the Mac-Mohan line, Arunachal Pradesh is part of Indian territory. The Mac-Mohan line was created in 1914 on the Simala accord.
- China rejects the Macmohan line and claims Arunachal Pradesh as part of China.
After 1962, the LAC line of actual control was created informally.
India-China Border Dispute History:
- Before 1950, Tibet was a buffer state between India and China.
- 1950: China occupied Tibet. India did not openly oppose it. But later, on receiving information about the suppression of culture in Tibet by China, India opposed it.
- 1959: Spiritual leader Dalai Lama came to India as political asylum.
- 1957–1959: China occupied the Aksai-Chin regions; Built strategic roads.
- 1962: China launched a massive invasion in October 1962. In the first week of October, the Chinese army occupied a large part of Arunachal Pradesh. The second wave of attacks came in November, with Chinese forces approaching the plains of Assam. Later China unilaterally ceased operations and withdrew its troops from all the occupied territories that were there before 1962.
- 1976: Both countries restored full diplomatic relations.
Question.
Explain the origin, dimensions, and implications of the Sino-Indian border dispute. (UPSC 2016)
Answer.
The Sino-Indian border dispute has deep historical roots and is one of the most complex and enduring territorial conflicts in the world.
The origins, dimensions, and implications of the Sino-Indian dispute are as follows:
Origin of Sino-Indian Border Dispute:
historical context:
The boundary dispute between India and China can be traced back to historical claims and demarcations made by the British colonial administration in India and the Qing dynasty in China. These demarcations were vague and imprecise, causing much disagreement over the actual alignment of the border.
McMahon Line:
An important source of contention is the McMahon Line, drawn up by British colonial official Sir Henry McMahon at the Simla Conference of 1914 between British India, Tibet, and China. China did not recognize the validity of this line, leading to conflicting interpretations of the boundary.
Aksai Chin:
Another disputed area is Aksai Chin, a region in the western Himalayas, claimed by India but controlled by China. The strategic importance of Aksai Chin, as it links China's Xinjiang region and Tibet, has further complicated the issue.
Tibet factor:
The status of Tibet has also played a role in the border dispute. China considers Tibet an integral part of its territory and claims that the boundary between India and China should be determined based on historical agreements between the Tibetan and Chinese empires.
Dimensions of the Sino-Indian border dispute:
Territorial Dispute:
The primary dimension of the Sino-Indian border dispute is the conflicting territorial claims over specific areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which separates the two countries.
Strategic Importance:
The disputed border areas hold significant strategic importance for both India and China due to their proximity to sensitive areas, military importance, and access to natural resources.
infrastructure development:
Both India and China have undertaken infrastructure development along their respective sides of the border, which sometimes escalates tensions as it is perceived as a change in the status quo.
Implications of the Sino-Indian border dispute:
Regional Stability:
The border dispute has implications for regional stability and security. An increase in disputed areas could strain bilateral relations and potentially lead to wider regional tensions.
diplomatic relations:
The dispute affects India-China diplomatic relations and often shapes their interactions at various international fora and multilateral platforms.
Border Deadlock:
Periodic border standoffs, like the Doklam standoff in 2017, have led to heightened tensions and military deployment.
Strategic Balance:
The Sino-Indian border dispute is part of a wider strategic competition between India and China in the Indo-Pacific region and their efforts to assert influence and control in Asia.
Economic Cooperation:
The border dispute may also affect economic cooperation between India and China, especially related to trade and investment.
Domestic Politics:
The handling of the border dispute can have implications for domestic politics in both countries, as it is often a sensitive and emotive issue for their respective populations.
Resolving the Sino-Indian border dispute remains a complex and challenging task, requiring political will, compromise, and recognition of historical complexities. Managing the dispute and preventing escalation and escalation will be important to maintain peace and stability in the region.
Question.
Discuss the issues related to the India-China border dispute. (66th BPSC)
Answer.
The India-China border dispute involves several complex and interrelated issues that have contributed to the ongoing territorial conflict between India and China.
The main issues involved in the India-China border dispute are as follows:
Territorial Claims:
The core issue in the border dispute is the conflicting territorial claims on specific areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which serves as the de facto border between India and China. Both countries have historical and cartographic evidence to support their claims, leading to different interpretations of the border alignment.
McMahon Line and Aksai Chin:
The McMahon Line, drawn by British colonial official Sir Henry McMahon in 1914, forms the basis of India's eastern border with China. However, China rejects the McMahon Line and considers it an unfair imposition on Tibet. Aksai Chin, a region in the western Himalayas, is another disputed territory, which India claims as part of Jammu and Kashmir but which is under Chinese control.
Demarcation and Perception:
The lack of a well-defined and mutually agreed-upon boundary has led to differences in the perception of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) by the two sides. This has resulted in periodic incursions and transgressions by the troops of both countries, leading to standoff and tension along the border.
Strategic Importance:
The disputed border areas hold significant strategic importance for both India and China due to their proximity to sensitive areas, military importance, and access to natural resources. Control over these areas can affect regional security dynamics.
Historical Factors:
Historical grievances and the legacy of colonial-era demarcations have contributed to the complexity of the boundary dispute. Historical claims and counterclaims from both sides add layers of controversy to the issue.
Infrastructure development:
Both India and China have developed infrastructure on their respective sides of the border. This includes roads, airstrips, and military facilities, which can be perceived as attempts to establish control and change the status quo.
Geopolitical Competition:
The border dispute is part of the wider geopolitical competition between India and China in the Indo-Pacific region. This is influenced by their efforts to establish influence and control not only in border areas but also in neighboring countries.
Tibet factor:
The status of Tibet has implications for the border dispute, as China considers it an integral part of its territory and claims that the border between India and China should be determined based on historical agreements between Tibet and the Chinese Empire.
Household Ideas:
The handling of border disputes is influenced by domestic political considerations in both India and China. Nationalistic sentiments, public opinion, and political dynamics can influence the approach adopted by governments.
Diplomatic Efforts:
Both India and China are engaged in dialogue and confidence-building measures to resolve the border dispute. However, finding a mutually acceptable solution has proved challenging due to the complexity and sensitivity of the issue.
Addressing the India-China border dispute requires delicate diplomacy, political will, and recognition of historical complexities. Confidence-building measures and dialogue are essential to prevent escalation and promote a peaceful solution in the region.
Question.
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is viewed as a cardinal subset of China's larger "One Belt One Road " initiative. Give a brief description of CPEC and enumerate the reasons why India has distanced itself from the same. ( UPSC General Studies III, 2018)
Answer.
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is indeed a crucial component of China's broader "One Belt One Road" (OBOR) initiative, which is now more commonly known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a massive infrastructure project that aims to connect China's western region, particularly its Xinjiang province, to Pakistan's southwestern port of Gwadar through a network of highways, railways, pipelines, and other infrastructure developments. It was officially launched in April 2015 and it became a significant driver of economic cooperation between China and Pakistan.
Key reasons why India has distanced itself from the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC):
Sovereignty Concerns:
One of the primary reasons behind India's opposition to The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is its route through Pakistan-administered Kashmir, a region that is an integral part of India. By passing through this disputed region, India sees The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as an infringement on its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Unilateral Decision:
India was not consulted or involved in the planning of The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which it perceives as a unilateral decision taken by China and Pakistan. This lack of engagement has contributed to India's skepticism and concerns about the project's motives and implications for regional stability.
Strategic Encirclement:
India views The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a strategic move by China to enhance its influence in the region while encircling India geopolitically. The corridor provides China with improved access to the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean, raising concerns about potential security implications for India.
Security Threats:
India has expressed concerns about the security challenges posed by The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), as it passes through areas known for their volatile security situation. Terrorist activities in these regions could potentially disrupt or threaten the functioning of the corridor.
Opposition to Border Road Initiative ( BRI):
Beyond The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), India has been generally skeptical about China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) due to concerns over its debt implications, lack of transparency, and potential for creating dependency among recipient countries.
In summary, India's opposition to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor stems from a combination of sovereignty concerns, strategic apprehensions, perceived economic imbalances, and broader skepticism toward China's Belt and Road Initiative. As a result, India has chosen to distance itself from the project and has not participated in any of its related activities.
Question.
Discuss the nature of India-China relations in the light of OBOR.
(UPPSC, UP PCS Mains General Studies-II/GS-2 2018)
Answer.
One Belt One Road (OBOR) is also known as China's Belt and Road Initiative ( BRI). The nature of India-China relations in light of One Belt One Road (OBOR), has been complex and multifaceted.
The One Belt One Road (OBOR) is a massive infrastructure and economic development project initiated by China that aims to enhance connectivity and promote trade and investment across Asia, Europe, Africa, and beyond.
In the context of India-China relations, the One Belt One Road (OBOR) has both positive and negative implications:
Sovereignty concerns:
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is the flagship project of the One Belt One Road (OBOR), which passes through Pakistan-administered Kashmir, which India considers as its integral part. India has objected to the One Belt One Road (OBOR) on grounds of sovereignty and territorial integrity. This further deteriorated the India-China relations and contributed to sovereignty concerns between the two countries.
Trade imbalances:
India has been facing a significant trade imbalance with China, with Chinese goods flooding the Indian market while Indian exports to China remain limited. The One Belt One Road (OBOR), with its focus on infrastructure development and connectivity, could further increase trade imbalances by improving transportation and logistics networks between the two countries. However, India has been cautious about becoming overly dependent on Chinese investments and has sought to maintain a balanced trade relationship.
Regional connectivity:
The One Belt One Road (OBOR) aims to enhance connectivity and promote regional integration. In this context, there are opportunities for India and China to collaborate on infrastructure projects that can benefit both countries and the wider region. For example, the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC) is a sub-regional connectivity project that could facilitate trade and people-to-people exchanges. However, progress on this front has been slow due to various geopolitical and strategic considerations.
Geopolitical rivalries:
The One Belt One Road (OBOR) has also added a geopolitical dimension to India-China relations. As China expands its influence through infrastructure projects and economic investments, India has been cautious about potential strategic encirclement and the long-term implications for its own security interests. India has been building partnerships and promoting its own connectivity initiatives, such as the International North-South Transport Corridor and the Chabahar Port project, to counterbalance China's influence in the region.
In summary, the nature of India-China relations in the light of the One Belt One Road (OBOR) is characterized by a mixture of sovereignty concerns, trade imbalance, and geopolitical rivalries. The One Belt One Road (OBOR) has both positive and negative implications for India-China relations, and navigating this complex landscape will require careful diplomacy, dialogue, and balancing of national interests.
Question.
Despite cordial Mamallpuram Submit between Prime Minister Modi and the Chinese President, the dispute on the line of actual control has deepened after a gap of several years. What do you think, are the reasons behind it?
(UPPSC, UP PCS Mains General Studies-II/GS-2 2020)
Answer.
The Mamallapuram summit, held in October 2019 between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping, aimed to improve bilateral relations and discuss issues, including the border dispute. Despite the cordial atmosphere during the summit, the border dispute along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) has remained a longstanding and complex issue between India and China.
Several reasons may have contributed to the deepening of the border dispute after the summit:
Differing Perceptions of Line of Actual Control (LAC):
India and China have different interpretations of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), leading to overlapping territorial claims. These differing perceptions often result in face-offs and disputes in the border areas.
Infrastructure Development:
Both countries have been increasing infrastructure development near the border regions to improve connectivity and strategic capabilities. This development has at times sparked tensions, as it is perceived as altering the status quo in disputed areas.
Strategic and Geopolitical Concerns:
The border dispute between India and China is intertwined with larger geopolitical concerns. China's growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region and its Belt and Road Initiative have increased complexities in the bilateral relationship.
Disputed Territories:
Specific areas, such as the Doklam region and Pangong Lake in Ladakh, have been particularly contentious and prone to standoffs between the two countries.
Historical Tensions:
Historical issues and unresolved border disputes from the past continue to influence the current state of affairs between India and China.
Lack of Mechanisms to Address Disputes:
While various agreements and mechanisms exist to manage border disputes, occasional violations and misunderstandings continue to occur.
Regional Rivalries:
The strategic interests and relationships of India and China with neighboring countries, such as Nepal and Pakistan, can also impact their relations and the border situation.
It is important to note that the India-China border dispute is a complex and long-standing issue with no quick-fix solutions.
Addressing the dispute requires political will, mutual trust, and sustained dialogue between the two countries.
ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon